Next Question
RSS
The BCS system is a giant bag of garbage and should be eliminated asap.
A team should not be punished at the end of the year for having a weak schedule. Teams should not be eliminated from contention just because they lost 1 game in September. Team sports, like football, are not meant to be decided by judges' scoring like figure skating or gymnastics. You have a season, find out who's good then put them all in a tournament where the losers go home. The current notion that the season acts as a really long playoff is hogwash because they losers are not sent home, they are forced to continue playing for second, third or even lower placing with absolutely no chance of winning the national title. In football, the only way your post season should end with a win is if you are the champion.
10 game season, a week for conference championships/tiebreakers, followed by a 24 team tournament (8 teams get a bye). Number of tourney seeds per conference are based on that conference's record against other conferences the previous year (If the MAC is winless in inter-conference play the previous year they would only have a seeding for their conference champ, if the ACC is undefeated they would be offered 4-6 slots).
As for sponsorship and bowl names sites, these could be preserved. There is no reason a semi-final game can't be called the Rose Bowl and held in Pasadena.
Permalink | Report
As President-Elect Obama says, no fan ever agrees with the BCS or likes it. It should be scrapped.
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
M$2
December 09, 2008 02:50 AM
Should NCAA football adapt a playoff system or stick with the BCS and why?
This season brings a good example of why both systems would work. We have undefeated teams out of the title game, which would suggest a playoff format would be better, while the BCS takes into account tougher schedules and allocates bowl games accordingly. What's your take?
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| December 09, 2008 07:02 PM |
A team should not be punished at the end of the year for having a weak schedule. Teams should not be eliminated from contention just because they lost 1 game in September. Team sports, like football, are not meant to be decided by judges' scoring like figure skating or gymnastics. You have a season, find out who's good then put them all in a tournament where the losers go home. The current notion that the season acts as a really long playoff is hogwash because they losers are not sent home, they are forced to continue playing for second, third or even lower placing with absolutely no chance of winning the national title. In football, the only way your post season should end with a win is if you are the champion.
10 game season, a week for conference championships/tiebreakers, followed by a 24 team tournament (8 teams get a bye). Number of tourney seeds per conference are based on that conference's record against other conferences the previous year (If the MAC is winless in inter-conference play the previous year they would only have a seeding for their conference champ, if the ACC is undefeated they would be offered 4-6 slots).
As for sponsorship and bowl names sites, these could be preserved. There is no reason a semi-final game can't be called the Rose Bowl and held in Pasadena.
| Asker's Rating: |
• Nice analysis, especially bringing up the last game of the season issue that currently exists. I like the idea of a 24-team tourney, which would give even the little guys a shot.
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (1)
December 09, 2008 09:46 PM
A playoff system would make the game much more interesting for those who rarely follow the sport. The BCS is confusing and half the year (every year) is spent trying to explain and validate teams positions. As President-Elect Obama says, no fan ever agrees with the BCS or likes it. It should be scrapped.
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- tsnap, November 25, 2009 08:31 PM
- vaniamelamed, November 25, 2009 08:24 PM
- scottklein, November 25, 2009 08:18 PM
- chrisfuentes1, November 25, 2009 07:59 PM
- missbadabing, November 25, 2009 07:58 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More