Ask questions via twitter! Message any question to @answers on twitter. We'll publish the question and send you a reply each time there's a new answer.

Warning About Economics Questions


 

Mahalo Answers is a great place to start your research into Economics questions, but it's not the final answer.

Mahalo Answers is not a substitute for informed professional advice. If you desire or require professional advice, please consult a qualified provider who is licensed in your state or country. You should always seek independent professional advice before acting on any opinion, advice, or information available on Mahalo Answers.

 
 


Next Question

Answered Question

 
 M¢37  Funded By Mahalo ? |  September 27, 2009 04:55 AM

According to one recent estimate, the unfunded liability of Social Security plus Medicare is 107 TRILLION dollars! How will this be paid?

"The unfunded liability is the difference between the benefits that have been promised to current and future retirees and what will be collected in dedicated taxes and Medicare premiums. Last year alone, this debt rose by $5 trillion. If no other reform is enacted, this funding gap can only be closed in future years by substantial tax increases, large benefit cuts or both."

I think our government has no choice but to print dollars, but then, I don't think holders of our current debt such as China or Japan will like being paid back in dollars that are worth so much less.

Any solutions? Or will our standard of living just drop way down?

Source:
http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba662
Interesting Question?  Yes (0)   No (0)   
RSS
 
 

Best Answer  Chosen by Asker

 
September 27, 2009 09:40 PM
They've been aware of this problem for a long time now, and the solutions are straitforward, but politically unpopular in the US, even though they were dealt with in other western industrialized countries.

The first is to just let people who don't want to retire at 65 keep working. Canada was facing a shortfall of ability to pay pension plan benefits, but they found that by just letting people work for two more years, and retire at 67, then given the wonders of compound interest on the two extra years of pension plan premiums combined with two less years of people drawing on the pension plan, it broke even again.

They didn't force people to keep working until 67... they just dropped the compulsory retirement clauses that were forcing people to retire at 65, so that if someone wanted to retire at 65 they could with no penalty, but if they wanted to keep working they could... they wouldn't be forced to retire (which they used to do, in order to make room for young people wanting to get started, but there's not as many young people being born as a percentage of the population as there used to be, so it doesn't matter so much anymore).

That leads to the issue of *how* those pension plan premiums were invested, and in the case of Sweden and Japan, both of whom have populations who naturally live a long time and, in the case of Swedes, who already have the ratio of elders to young workers that the US is just starting to move into, they allow public pension plan funds to be invested in blue-chip industries, whereas in the US, blue-chip investments are saved for the rich-elite to play with, leaving basic money-market and bond-type investments for pulbic pension plans to work with.

There is no solution if the american elite are going to insist on special access to the investments that produce the good returns, even though those returns are coming from the work of exactly the people who, when they get older, will be needing some payback for all their labour (they do it by calling it "socialist"... and you'd have to live in the US for awhile to see just how comical it is they way they've turned that word into having demonic implications... they did it by confusing everyone into thinking that socialism and communism are the same thing, when in fact there's nothing communists hate more than socialists, but that's another story...) and so for now the politicians are all sticking their heads benieth the sand, but Japan has already given the US a head's up notice that although it has trillions of dollars in savings, that the US is not to come to them to ask for assistance *because* those savings are *already* earmarked for their future elderly.
Asker's Rating:
• You made some good points! Thank you.


Helpful Answer?  (1)   (0)   

Helpful: duenhsiyen

Tip omicron for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
September 27, 2009 10:28 PM
In todays paper, there was a similar solution proposed:
http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009909270341

Back in 1935 when the Social Security was first started, people who lived to 65 were expected to live to 77, which means the payout was for an additional 12 years. So the article suggests gradually increasing the eligibility age 1 month for every 3 months, until the eligibility age reaches the age where on average, people would again get just 12 years of benefits before they died. That age would be 76 under present conditions. Now, I do not know if the age people die is going to increase anymore. In fact, with all the obesity, I suspect, the lifespan may actually decrease. Also, where are all the jobs going to come from? We already have a shortage of jobs, it seems. It was also my understanding that as originally conceived, you were not supposed to draw on the benefit unless you really needed it. It was not considered an "entitlement."

I would say the situation is more complex. If we did not have so much fraud in the system, such as improper monetary policy that led to this country's current financial bust, then this problem might not be even arising. Most pension plans are now currently underfunded too, not only Social Security.

Report
 
 
 
September 29, 2009 04:04 AM
Two articles appear today, the first reporting Social Security will be paying more out than taking in this year and next, because of job losses forcing people to collect Social Security earlier. The second reports that job seekers currently outnumber job openings 6 to 1.

http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009909280358
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/27/business/economy/27jobs.html

Report
 
 

Answer this Question

How tips and payments work

This question has already been resolved. You may add an answer to it but you will not be eligible to win best answer or any associated tips.

Ask a Question


140 characters left
Top of Page
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal

Top Members

This Week All Time
  • cfinke
    cfinke
    2nd Degree Black Belt
    29143 Points
    M$29.75 Earned
  • bunnyphuph...
    bunnyphuph...
    2nd Degree Black Belt
    21921 Points
    M$775.99 Earned
  • opher
    opher
    Purple Belt with a Brown Tip
    6588 Points
    M$248.34 Earned
   See All
 

Most Popular Tags

mahalo(1837)
music(525)
iphone(496)
google(398)
online(380)
food(361)
money(304)
beer(297)
movies(296)
apple(265)
health(238)
aotd(235)
video(234)
free(234)
dog(219)
best(214)
   See All
 

Categories

Welcome New Members

  • romil09, December 16, 2009 09:18 AM
  • mranty, December 16, 2009 09:15 AM
  • blel58, December 16, 2009 09:11 AM
  • xartz, December 16, 2009 09:10 AM
  • lalitha, December 16, 2009 09:05 AM

 
 
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.

Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.

Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More

 
 

Please log in to use this function.