Next Question
Very few news sources have been adequately covering this war, it's a lot more complex then just Hutu rebels invading. It's a resource war.
Johann Hari of the Independent wrote a pretty compelling article back in 2008 and says straight up the Genocide is because of western greed.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/33749589@N07/3198835370/
---quote---
There are two stories about how this war began – the official story, and the true story. The official story is that after the Rwandan genocide, the Hutu mass murderers fled across the border into Congo. The Rwandan government chased after them. But it's a lie. How do we know? The Rwandan government didn't go to where the Hutu genocidaires were, at least not at first. They went to where Congo's natural resources were – and began to pillage them. They even told their troops to work with any Hutus they came across. Congo is the richest country in the world for gold, diamonds, coltan, cassiterite, and more. Everybody wanted a slice – so six other countries invaded.
These resources were not being stolen to for use in Africa. They were seized so they could be sold on to us. The more we bought, the more the invaders stole – and slaughtered. The rise of mobile phones caused a surge in deaths, because the coltan they contain is found primarily in Congo. The UN named the international corporations it believed were involved: Anglo-America, Standard Chartered Bank, De Beers and more than 100 others. (They all deny the charges.) But instead of stopping these corporations, our governments demanded that the UN stop criticising them.
---/quote---
And that's just one mans perspective, dozens of rebel groups fighting for resources to sell to western companies so they can sell to us.
For video perspectives Journeyman Pictures has been documenting the conflict the years, go to their video section and search "Congo" you'll get nearly 30 results.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/33749589@N07/3216702715/
--
Source(s):
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/johann-hari-h...?
Permalink | Report
According to the wiki article, the war officially ended in 2003, but of course being official or not, genocide is going to continue (as it does there today)
My sources should explain it pretty good besides that.
Source(s):
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28749655/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Congo_War
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| January 22, 2009 06:48 AM |
Johann Hari of the Independent wrote a pretty compelling article back in 2008 and says straight up the Genocide is because of western greed.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/33749589@N07/3198835370/
---quote---
There are two stories about how this war began – the official story, and the true story. The official story is that after the Rwandan genocide, the Hutu mass murderers fled across the border into Congo. The Rwandan government chased after them. But it's a lie. How do we know? The Rwandan government didn't go to where the Hutu genocidaires were, at least not at first. They went to where Congo's natural resources were – and began to pillage them. They even told their troops to work with any Hutus they came across. Congo is the richest country in the world for gold, diamonds, coltan, cassiterite, and more. Everybody wanted a slice – so six other countries invaded.
These resources were not being stolen to for use in Africa. They were seized so they could be sold on to us. The more we bought, the more the invaders stole – and slaughtered. The rise of mobile phones caused a surge in deaths, because the coltan they contain is found primarily in Congo. The UN named the international corporations it believed were involved: Anglo-America, Standard Chartered Bank, De Beers and more than 100 others. (They all deny the charges.) But instead of stopping these corporations, our governments demanded that the UN stop criticising them.
---/quote---
And that's just one mans perspective, dozens of rebel groups fighting for resources to sell to western companies so they can sell to us.
For video perspectives Journeyman Pictures has been documenting the conflict the years, go to their video section and search "Congo" you'll get nearly 30 results.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/33749589@N07/3216702715/
--
Source(s):
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/johann-hari-h...?
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (2)
January 22, 2009 01:14 AM
The Congo Genocide started as a result of the Hutu rebels (the ones responsible for the genocide in Rwanda) moving across the border into the Congo and continuing it.According to the wiki article, the war officially ended in 2003, but of course being official or not, genocide is going to continue (as it does there today)
My sources should explain it pretty good besides that.
Source(s):
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28749655/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Congo_War
Permalink | Report
January 22, 2009 07:31 AM
The war in the Congo started in 1994, a direct result of the genocide in Rwanda. Rwanda attacked its refugees who had fled into Congo in 1996. Current conflicts included organized militias, government armies, and civil war combatants. Over 4 millions have died since 1998, making it the most brutal conflict since World War II. Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- sparab, November 12, 2009 07:10 AM
- destinycgs, November 12, 2009 07:09 AM
- ah1220, November 12, 2009 07:06 AM
- klaguna, November 12, 2009 06:43 AM
- ashlikesfood, November 12, 2009 06:28 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More


