The difference has already been made.
The jury in Italy is not sequestered or questioned for their points of view to test for bias. In addition they can go home and read the news, watch tv shows etc. etc. Since day one there were negative sensationalized headlines and has helped to leave a very bad impression on the accused. Example the last post left use the words "If she wants the publicity as part of some fetish or arrousal"
Where would those harsh words come if not from a source of negative headlines. A few days ago a coroner testified that a knife which the prosecutors claimed to have Amanda's DNA on the handle is not the murder weapon.
Permalink | Report