answered question

answers (2)

jmbrown
0
Votes
BEST ANSWER  chosen by asker   |  jmbrown  |  February 12, 2009 05:37 AM
I think in this case it might be too little. It is like mass murder. There have been 181 deaths and over 1000 homes lost. Not to mention the needless loss of wildlife. I think a life sentence would be more appropriate.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JwwRkIdojE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agacQbJr0_c

Comment
mooncat
0
Votes
mooncat  |  February 09, 2009 03:57 AM
Definitely not too little. In the current weather circumstances, lighting a fire was akin to murder, so a similar law applies (and it would have to have been homicidal thoughts going through any perpertrators heads at the time). As there were multiple fatalities, an effective life sentence would probably be handed down, which is about right. We've also apparently got a charge of "reckless murder" which can have a maximum life sentence.
Comment
140

ask any question

Top of Page
Buy Mahalo Dollars
WITH CREDIT CARD OR PAYPAL

Please log in to use this function.