Next Question
RSS
yes the singer's doctor should be charged for homocide
"Homicide (Latin homicidium, homo human being + caedere to cut, kill) refers to the act of killing another human being.1 It can also describe a person who has committed such an act, though this use is rare in modern English. Homicide is not always an illegal act." (note this was quoted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide)
legal definition is
The killing of one human being by another human being.
Although the term homicide is sometimes used synonymously with murder, homicide is broader in scope than murder. Murder is a form of criminal homicide; other forms of homicide might not constitute criminal acts. These homicides are regarded as justified or excusable. For example, individuals may, in a necessary act of Self-Defense, kill a person who threatens them with death or serious injury, or they may be commanded or authorized by law to kill a person who is a member of an enemy force or who has committed a serious crime. Typically, the circumstances surrounding a killing determine whether it is criminal. The intent of the killer usually determines whether a criminal homicide is classified as murder or Manslaughter and at what degree.Homicide may perhaps be described to be the destruction of the life of one human being, either by himself, or by the act, procurement, or culpable omission of another. When the death has been intentionally caused by the deceased himself, the offender is called felo de se; when it is caused by another, it is justifiable, excusable, or felonious. " (information obtain from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Homicide)
the main reason for this would be culpability
"reckless endangerment has a much broader requirement: "A person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in conduct which places or may place another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury." Thus to be guilty of this one only needs to be aware of a substantial risk he is putting others in danger of; it does not have to be one's explicit goal to put people in risk. (But, if one's goal is to put others in substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury, this is, of course, sufficient.)"{quoted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culpability}
if he did administer the drugs although withe MJ consent it is wrong
as licensed medical practitioner Dr.Conrad Murray can be charged for reckless endangerment a misdemeanor of the second degree. from what i have research i would say it is fair to charged the doctor
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culpability
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Homicide
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide
Permalink | Report
MJ was on A LOT of drugs apparently and it could have been an accident. Still, I guess accidental homicide is still homicide.
Still, the doctor says he never ordered or administered the drug to MJ - which you would think would be extremely easy to find out who DID get it. They don't just hand out that kind of powerful drug. Drug companies and distributors keep very close tabs on who orders and receives their products - they don't want to get sued either (which points to a doctor ordering the drug in the first palce).
It will be interesting to see how this turns out. Looks bad for the doc...
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propofol
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propofol
Permalink | Report
Source(s):
http://www.mahalo.com/michael-jackson-homicide
Permalink | Report
The source initially said Dr. Conrad Murray could be arrested as soon as next Wednesday — but investigators have decided to execute one more search warrant, likely at a Los Angeles pharmacy, next week in an attempt to gather more evidence against him. The arrest is now expected the following week.
Source(s):
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,540540,00.html
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
M$1
August 24, 2009 09:18 PM
Michael Jackson's death is officially ruled a homicide. Should the singer's doctor be charged with homicide?
No one is yet charged with killing Michael Jackson, but it is highly likely that Dr. Conrad Murray, who has been the subject of intense media scrutiny and law enforcement investigation, will be the culprit taken into custody.
By all accounts, Dr. Murray, who is said to have administered the fatal dose of propofol to Michael Jackson, after the singer repeatedly insisted on the injection, was just the last in a long line of enablers who plied the singer with drugs over the decades.
Do you think it is fair that Dr. Murray may be charged with killing Michael Jackson?
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/michael_jackson/2009/08/24/2009-08-24_michael_jacksons_death_ruled_a_homicide_by_la_coroner.html
By all accounts, Dr. Murray, who is said to have administered the fatal dose of propofol to Michael Jackson, after the singer repeatedly insisted on the injection, was just the last in a long line of enablers who plied the singer with drugs over the decades.
Do you think it is fair that Dr. Murray may be charged with killing Michael Jackson?
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/michael_jackson/2009/08/24/2009-08-24_michael_jacksons_death_ruled_a_homicide_by_la_coroner.html
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
RSS
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| August 24, 2009 10:17 PM |
"Homicide (Latin homicidium, homo human being + caedere to cut, kill) refers to the act of killing another human being.1 It can also describe a person who has committed such an act, though this use is rare in modern English. Homicide is not always an illegal act." (note this was quoted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide)
legal definition is
The killing of one human being by another human being.
Although the term homicide is sometimes used synonymously with murder, homicide is broader in scope than murder. Murder is a form of criminal homicide; other forms of homicide might not constitute criminal acts. These homicides are regarded as justified or excusable. For example, individuals may, in a necessary act of Self-Defense, kill a person who threatens them with death or serious injury, or they may be commanded or authorized by law to kill a person who is a member of an enemy force or who has committed a serious crime. Typically, the circumstances surrounding a killing determine whether it is criminal. The intent of the killer usually determines whether a criminal homicide is classified as murder or Manslaughter and at what degree.Homicide may perhaps be described to be the destruction of the life of one human being, either by himself, or by the act, procurement, or culpable omission of another. When the death has been intentionally caused by the deceased himself, the offender is called felo de se; when it is caused by another, it is justifiable, excusable, or felonious. " (information obtain from http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Homicide)
the main reason for this would be culpability
"reckless endangerment has a much broader requirement: "A person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree if he recklessly engages in conduct which places or may place another person in danger of death or serious bodily injury." Thus to be guilty of this one only needs to be aware of a substantial risk he is putting others in danger of; it does not have to be one's explicit goal to put people in risk. (But, if one's goal is to put others in substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury, this is, of course, sufficient.)"{quoted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culpability}
if he did administer the drugs although withe MJ consent it is wrong
as licensed medical practitioner Dr.Conrad Murray can be charged for reckless endangerment a misdemeanor of the second degree. from what i have research i would say it is fair to charged the doctor
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culpability
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Homicide
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: ewpldf, buddawiggi
Other Answers (7)
August 24, 2009 09:26 PM
I will admit to being surprised that they ruled it a homicide. MJ was on A LOT of drugs apparently and it could have been an accident. Still, I guess accidental homicide is still homicide.
Still, the doctor says he never ordered or administered the drug to MJ - which you would think would be extremely easy to find out who DID get it. They don't just hand out that kind of powerful drug. Drug companies and distributors keep very close tabs on who orders and receives their products - they don't want to get sued either (which points to a doctor ordering the drug in the first palce).
It will be interesting to see how this turns out. Looks bad for the doc...
Permalink | Report
August 24, 2009 10:18 PM
I think Dr. Conrad Murray should be charged if he administered the propofol to MJ. The patient has to be watched at all times under the influenced of the drug. If Murray couldn't keep an eye on him, he should have had a nurse or assistant to help him. Besides in my opinion, Murray was negligent because he knew Jackson was an addict. The doc should have referred MJ to rehab not enable him in obtaining drugs.
Permalink | Report
August 24, 2009 10:49 PM
He most definitely should be charged. Doctors know that this drug can not be given outside of a hospital due to the dangerousness of it. They also know that you have to be monitored very, very closely after given this drug. The doctor is at fault. He knew the risks and proceeded to break his ethical code by acting in a way that was harmful and deadly to his patient and he would have known that repeated use of this drug would most likely end in death eventually. Doctors are supposed to protect their patients which is why they take the Hypocratic oath to do no harm and he completely disregarded that. I am assuming that he was driven by the amount of money that he was being offered which makes it that much more unethical. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propofol
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propofol
Permalink | Report
August 24, 2009 11:48 PM
Yes, if they have evidence that he administered the drug to Jackson that day. I'd say it's negligent to administer a drug at a residence, when it is otherwise exclusively used at hospitals, and without the proper supervision and monitoring that would be required. http://www.mahalo.com/michael-jackson-homicide
Source(s):
http://www.mahalo.com/michael-jackson-homicide
Permalink | Report
August 25, 2009 01:29 AM
Michael Jackson’s personal physician will be charged with manslaughter within the next two weeks, a law enforcement source told FOXNews.com. The source initially said Dr. Conrad Murray could be arrested as soon as next Wednesday — but investigators have decided to execute one more search warrant, likely at a Los Angeles pharmacy, next week in an attempt to gather more evidence against him. The arrest is now expected the following week.
Source(s):
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,540540,00.html
Permalink | Report
Voted as best: kerryk
August 25, 2009 02:41 AM
No, I don't think he alone should be charged. If he is charged then I think ALL of the doctors that gave him drugs throughout his last couple of years should be charged. I think since it is MJ that people are just trying to find someone to blame. Also, if he is charged I think he will beat the charges, but if he is charged then so should EVERY other doctor that has recently administered him drugs.
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
As a parent, when should you stop paying for your child's gas money? Or should you st...
How long should you hold on to your children's baby clothes and toys before it is con...
I'm building a new home should I install a residential Fire Sprinkler system ? The Co...
In final fantasy 8 card game how do you turn the rules to win one card to win all car...
How long should you hold on to your children's baby clothes and toys before it is con...
I'm building a new home should I install a residential Fire Sprinkler system ? The Co...
In final fantasy 8 card game how do you turn the rules to win one card to win all car...
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- alycat71, November 23, 2009 03:56 AM
- suessa, November 23, 2009 03:54 AM
- john_atezho, November 23, 2009 03:44 AM
- massah, November 23, 2009 03:40 AM
- nataliewalker84, November 23, 2009 03:38 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More

http://www.mahalo.com/how-to-get-a-best-answer-on-mahalo