Next Question
RSS
Well, if that's the whole video, then no, they weren't wrong in what they did. It's similar to the bear in a campsite situation. It's not uncommon for unsuspecting bear to snoop around a campsite. If it happens to be your tent he's snooping in you hope that he finishes with your site and is on his way. Unfortunately in some cases the bear doesn't leave, and can become possessive of the area surrounding the campsite. In that case Rangers have to move in and subdue the animal.
Unfortunately, in the water you're on your own. One thing I noticed is that to the untrained eye it doesn't look like they're struggling with the shark, what people need to keep in mind is everything is much slower in the water. It also tends to have a more graceful appearance. The divers also mentioned something that's very important, they're always around sharks. From my experience (PATI certified deep sea diver for 7 years) the only people that deserve to be attacked by sharks are the ones who invite it. Meaning the throw chud (bloody fish guts) in the water to attract sharks, this is the equivalent of throwing steak around your campsite to attract bears. Drives me nuts, because when a hungry shark ends up attacking a diver they kill it.
Back to the case at hand, it doesn't appear they were inviting the attack, it was just wrong place at the wrong time. The only thing that's nagging me is the fact that they were spear fishing. We don't see any mention of it in the video but had they just caught (speared) some fish? If so... the shark very well could've been attracted by the smell of blood in the water, hungry, and that's when the attack occurred. I'd be interested in seeing the rest of the video, or what's cut out of the video.
Source(s):
7 year PATI certified deep sea diver
Permalink | Report
But, that's only my opinion based on the video that you linked to. I don't know the people, their backgrounds, their credibility, etc. There could be a lot of information that I don't know which could change my thoughts.
Permalink | Report
This shark was 15 feet from them and in the clip you can see it swam at him directly. These divers are not at fault in any way. They were about to become part of the food chain and given the experience of the divers and the nature of the fish they acted correctly. I know if I was under the water and a one ton killing machine strafing me I would have killed the fish and would have been in dire need of a fresh wetsuit. From what I saw the men were not stabbing at the shark with diving knives enjoying the experience or acting in any way that suggested they were doing it to be malicious. The diver never abandoned the shark in the whole process. Which given the nature of other sharks to detect blood in the water says something about the nature of the divers. Having worked with aspects of the forest service I can and do agree with egoods assessment on the nature of bears and I would agree they are excellent parallels. Though I will defer to his experience diving as I have never done that. But I do know sharks are predators just like bears are and if they decide you are on the menu sometimes you have to take drastic and unfortunate measures to ensure your survival. I know there are a lot of people who love animals out there. But, given the choice between a human life and a living animal I would choose the human life every time without hesitation or reservations.
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_shark
http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/Gallery/Descript/Tigershark/tigershark.htm
http://marinebio.org/species.asp?id=37
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sharks/FS_Tiger.htm
http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/sharks/Statistics/species2.htm
Daley, Audrey (1994). Shark. Hodder & Stroughton. ISBN 0-340-61654-7
http://www2.hawaii.edu/~carlm/tigershark.html
http://www.sharkinfo.ch/SI1_99e/attacks2.html
Permalink | Report
nushka
Answered Question
M$1
March 14, 2009 12:54 AM
Men vs. tiger shark video
Do you think they do the wrong thing by killing shark as the CNN viewers claimed?
http://tinyurl.com/manshark
http://tinyurl.com/manshark
Interesting Question?
Yes (2)
No (0)
- In Current Events |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| March 14, 2009 03:46 AM |
Unfortunately, in the water you're on your own. One thing I noticed is that to the untrained eye it doesn't look like they're struggling with the shark, what people need to keep in mind is everything is much slower in the water. It also tends to have a more graceful appearance. The divers also mentioned something that's very important, they're always around sharks. From my experience (PATI certified deep sea diver for 7 years) the only people that deserve to be attacked by sharks are the ones who invite it. Meaning the throw chud (bloody fish guts) in the water to attract sharks, this is the equivalent of throwing steak around your campsite to attract bears. Drives me nuts, because when a hungry shark ends up attacking a diver they kill it.
Back to the case at hand, it doesn't appear they were inviting the attack, it was just wrong place at the wrong time. The only thing that's nagging me is the fact that they were spear fishing. We don't see any mention of it in the video but had they just caught (speared) some fish? If so... the shark very well could've been attracted by the smell of blood in the water, hungry, and that's when the attack occurred. I'd be interested in seeing the rest of the video, or what's cut out of the video.
Source(s):
7 year PATI certified deep sea diver
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (2)
March 14, 2009 03:20 AM
If everything that they're saying is true, then no, I think they acted in self defense and did the right thing. They said that they swim with sharks all the time, sometimes 10+ feet long, sometimes groups of 100 of them. They must know how to handle sharks very well. And they said, "We really wanted to have a different outcome here, but unfortunately that wasn't possible." What were they supposed to do, draw out the fight for longer than was safe and risk their lives to save that of an animal who was trying to kill them? They did what they could to avoid the situation. But, that's only my opinion based on the video that you linked to. I don't know the people, their backgrounds, their credibility, etc. There could be a lot of information that I don't know which could change my thoughts.
Permalink | Report
March 14, 2009 05:21 PM
Sharks are highly evolved killing machines. A tiger shark is second largest predatory shark (after the great white shark). The tiger shark is second only to the great white shark, coming close to the bull shark in number of recorded attacks on humans and is considered, along with the great white, bull shark, and the oceanic whitetip shark to be one of the sharks most dangerous to humans. The tiger shark is responsible for a large percentage of the fatal attacks that do occur on humans, and is regarded as one of the most dangerous species of sharks.The shark is known to be aggressive and because of its aggressive nature of feeding, it is common to find a variety of foreign objects inside the digestive tract of a tiger shark. Some examples of more unusual items are automobile number plates, petroleum cans, tires, suits of armor, and baseballs. For this reason, the tiger shark is often regarded as the ocean's garbage can. This shark was 15 feet from them and in the clip you can see it swam at him directly. These divers are not at fault in any way. They were about to become part of the food chain and given the experience of the divers and the nature of the fish they acted correctly. I know if I was under the water and a one ton killing machine strafing me I would have killed the fish and would have been in dire need of a fresh wetsuit. From what I saw the men were not stabbing at the shark with diving knives enjoying the experience or acting in any way that suggested they were doing it to be malicious. The diver never abandoned the shark in the whole process. Which given the nature of other sharks to detect blood in the water says something about the nature of the divers. Having worked with aspects of the forest service I can and do agree with egoods assessment on the nature of bears and I would agree they are excellent parallels. Though I will defer to his experience diving as I have never done that. But I do know sharks are predators just like bears are and if they decide you are on the menu sometimes you have to take drastic and unfortunate measures to ensure your survival. I know there are a lot of people who love animals out there. But, given the choice between a human life and a living animal I would choose the human life every time without hesitation or reservations.
Source(s):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_shark
http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/Gallery/Descript/Tigershark/tigershark.htm
http://marinebio.org/species.asp?id=37
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sharks/FS_Tiger.htm
http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/fish/sharks/Statistics/species2.htm
Daley, Audrey (1994). Shark. Hodder & Stroughton. ISBN 0-340-61654-7
http://www2.hawaii.edu/~carlm/tigershark.html
http://www.sharkinfo.ch/SI1_99e/attacks2.html
Permalink | Report
nushka
March 18, 2009 01:49 AM
There is no such a thing as a highly evolved organism. Evolution has no meassure. It could be highly adapted or highly specialized.
Tip nushka for this comment
Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- sabsmom, November 11, 2009 04:06 AM
- alicia09, November 11, 2009 03:59 AM
- fb_706785618, November 11, 2009 03:46 AM
- galle3354, November 11, 2009 03:44 AM
- shanypro, November 11, 2009 03:39 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
