Next Question
RSS
I'm left of center politically but I'm against passionate release in this case.
For those of you have read Bugliosi's Helter Skelter, the main book about the Charles Manson cult and the Sharon Tate, et al murders, you may recall that the book opens with the reporting of a group of day-campers overnighting on the campus of a girl's school.
Bugliosoi interviewed a couple of the counselors, not us campers. So the story is not exactly accurate. I was a camper and awake. Those of us awake did, as reported, hear the murders of Sharon Tate, Abigail Folger (the coffee heiress) and others. The 40th anniversary just passed one month ago. I still have post-traumatic stress nightmares. Being an earwitness is much like being an eyewitness, I imagine. The murders were not quick. The victims begged for their lives. Sharon Tate begged for the life of her unborn child by Roman Polanski, her husband.
I've seen the police photo of Sharon Tate's and another victim's body. I'll never forget the horror of the endless screams. No, this time I, a doctor's daughter and a card-carrying liberal, do not vote for compassionate release.
Source(s):
From very personal experience
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
She made a choice when she helped murder those people for the sport of it. It is a huge injustice to all those killed if she is released.
If they let her out, the other nut will want loose, because she was released.
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
M$1.10
September 03, 2009 02:51 PM
Should Susan Atkins be given a passionate release?
James Whitehouse pleaded for the release of his wife Susan Atkins at a parole hearing this week, but ultimately the parole was denied. Atkins, who was involved in the Charles Manson murders, is suffering from terminal brain cancer. Whitehouse, also served as her attorney in the hearing, at which she slept on a gurney.
Since Atkins is barely able to stay conscious during the hearings from her cancer, is that proof that she is no longer a danger to society and deserves a passionate release or should she stay in prison to die from the magnitude of her crimes?
Since Atkins is barely able to stay conscious during the hearings from her cancer, is that proof that she is no longer a danger to society and deserves a passionate release or should she stay in prison to die from the magnitude of her crimes?
- About James Whitehouse |
- In Criminals |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| September 03, 2009 03:47 PM |
For those of you have read Bugliosi's Helter Skelter, the main book about the Charles Manson cult and the Sharon Tate, et al murders, you may recall that the book opens with the reporting of a group of day-campers overnighting on the campus of a girl's school.
Bugliosoi interviewed a couple of the counselors, not us campers. So the story is not exactly accurate. I was a camper and awake. Those of us awake did, as reported, hear the murders of Sharon Tate, Abigail Folger (the coffee heiress) and others. The 40th anniversary just passed one month ago. I still have post-traumatic stress nightmares. Being an earwitness is much like being an eyewitness, I imagine. The murders were not quick. The victims begged for their lives. Sharon Tate begged for the life of her unborn child by Roman Polanski, her husband.
I've seen the police photo of Sharon Tate's and another victim's body. I'll never forget the horror of the endless screams. No, this time I, a doctor's daughter and a card-carrying liberal, do not vote for compassionate release.
Source(s):
From very personal experience
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (3)
September 03, 2009 03:00 PM
This is a hard one. I'm usually a real softy when it comes to things like this, giving people second chances, etc, but in all honesty, those murders were probably the most heinous of our lifetime. I would have a very hard time releasing her, even in the state she is in. She is obviously no longer a danger to society, but does she deserve to be out of prison? I think that's a question only the Lord Almighty can answer at this point.
Permalink | Report
September 03, 2009 04:03 PM
Hey @samid
The History Channel is airing a special on the Manson tragedy September 7th with Linda Kasabian giving her whole story.
http://www.history.com/genericContent.do?id=71946
Report
The History Channel is airing a special on the Manson tragedy September 7th with Linda Kasabian giving her whole story.
http://www.history.com/genericContent.do?id=71946
September 03, 2009 03:21 PM
I do not think so. Whatever you feel about people being rehabilitated in prison, legally she was sentenced to life in prison. That means she is there until she dies, no matter how she dies. Just because she is dying of brain cancer doesn't mean her sentence should change. Her victim's did not get a second chance at life, and though I am a forgiving person, being forgiven does not alleviate you from your consequences.
Permalink | Report
September 03, 2009 03:52 PM
Great answer @jkrabb. My thoughts exactly.
When looking at a story like this, you also have to take into account how that person has acted while incarcerated. Has she shown remorse, or behaved well while in prison all these years?
There are many things that come into play with a question like this, and since I'm not Judge Judy... I'll give my gavel to the proper authorities.
(welcome to Mahalo!)
Report
When looking at a story like this, you also have to take into account how that person has acted while incarcerated. Has she shown remorse, or behaved well while in prison all these years?
There are many things that come into play with a question like this, and since I'm not Judge Judy... I'll give my gavel to the proper authorities.
(welcome to Mahalo!)
September 03, 2009 04:54 PM
I don't believe she should get paroled either. They will take care of her there, as well as they could out here. She made a choice when she helped murder those people for the sport of it. It is a huge injustice to all those killed if she is released.
If they let her out, the other nut will want loose, because she was released.
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Voted "No best answer": psionandy,
Related Questions
Antique Appraisal: How much money should I ask for these and where can I sell them fo...
Does Oprah Winfrey have the credentials to run for political office? Could she win? D...
Elite RT @Jason: What XBOX package should i buy today? I want to get it for Call of D...
Given that they don't understand the season,do you think it's a good idea to buy your...
Does Oprah Winfrey have the credentials to run for political office? Could she win? D...
Elite RT @Jason: What XBOX package should i buy today? I want to get it for Call of D...
Given that they don't understand the season,do you think it's a good idea to buy your...
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
Thank you for sharing.