Next Question
RSS
If the NFL is serious about cleaning up its image, a one-year suspension might not be stiff enough. Donte Stallworth made a terrible decision that ended up costing someone else their life. The league did the right thing by stepping up and holding the players accountable to their behavior even when the legal system did not.
Anything less than one year would not have sent an appropriate message to the players and I think this could have easily been more (though I think a longer suspension would probably been inconsistent with other penalties the league has given out).
Permalink | Report
thebandit
gno
Donte caused the death of another human being. This deserves to be punished significantly. I will say that the original "indefinite" suspension is rather questionable, considering that puts everyone in limbo, the team, Donte, the family, the fans, etc. But as for the one year suspension, there have been one year suspensions for lesser offenses, so at the discretion of the NFL, one year is quite fair, and arguably could have been harsher.
Permalink | Report
Since his actions violated that contract in a way that could hardly be worse, I personally think he should never be allowed to play the game again.
Permalink | Report
Permalink | Report
Source(s):
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/browns/2009-04-02-stallworth-co...
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
M$2
August 13, 2009 03:05 PM
Is the one-year Donte Stallworth suspension fair?
Cleveland Browns receiver Donte Stallworth was suspended for the entire 2009 NFL season today as a result of his DUI manslaughter incident back in March.
Seeing as how Stallworth has already dealt with the incident in court, both receiving a sentence involving jail time, community service and probation, as well as sending the victim's family money, should he still face a suspension from the league? Is the one-year suspension fair? Should it be more or less?
Seeing as how Stallworth has already dealt with the incident in court, both receiving a sentence involving jail time, community service and probation, as well as sending the victim's family money, should he still face a suspension from the league? Is the one-year suspension fair? Should it be more or less?
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
- About Donte Stallworth Suspended |
- In Cleveland Browns |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| August 13, 2009 03:32 PM |
Anything less than one year would not have sent an appropriate message to the players and I think this could have easily been more (though I think a longer suspension would probably been inconsistent with other penalties the league has given out).
Permalink | Report
thebandit
August 17, 2009 04:29 PM
Hey! I really liked this answer - it was detailed, fair and well-thought-out. Keep it up!
Tip thebandit for this comment
Report
gno
August 18, 2009 01:30 PM
Excellent answer. Kudos. Welcome to Mahalo!
Tip gno for this comment
Report
Other Answers (5)
August 13, 2009 04:24 PM
The NFL has always been very worried about it's image. Players get paid huge sums of money to play in the NFL, and are thus subject to a lot of limitations and restrictions that a common person would find rather onerous. Appearance, mandatory meetings, fines for criticizing refs, etc. With great privilege comes great responsibility. Donte caused the death of another human being. This deserves to be punished significantly. I will say that the original "indefinite" suspension is rather questionable, considering that puts everyone in limbo, the team, Donte, the family, the fans, etc. But as for the one year suspension, there have been one year suspensions for lesser offenses, so at the discretion of the NFL, one year is quite fair, and arguably could have been harsher.
Permalink | Report
August 13, 2009 04:40 PM
Living in Cleveland I am amazed at the reaction from Browns fans on this one actually. It seems most die-hard Browns fans feel Donte is getting off way to easy with his suspension. His actions clearly violated is contract since the NFL has a rather strict code of conduct which players must follow when not on the field. Since his actions violated that contract in a way that could hardly be worse, I personally think he should never be allowed to play the game again.
Permalink | Report
August 13, 2009 07:09 PM
sounds like the Cleveland fans have some morals, I dont know if he should not ever be allowed to play but some is dead because he was reckless, a year suspension is getting off easily.
Report
August 13, 2009 10:20 PM
The NFL considers itself a professional organization. Implicit in such a designation is that your actions -- whether or not they are performed in a capacity related to your job -- reflect on not only you, but also the profession you are a member of. This is why you see doctors, lawyers and the military censured for inappropriate actions, regardless of when they execute them.
Permalink | Report
August 17, 2009 04:29 AM
My honest assessment is the same for Micheal Vick. Let him serve how many years he's supposed to be in jail. I think the league should suspend him indefinitely until they come out with a verdict. I agree that Stallworth should have been suspended from the league. However, he will already be jailed for a maximum of 15 years. Why add to the fire? He regrets his decision greatly and is (partially) willing to pay the price. The NFL has done its job well, and his sentence is fair. Now, let the legal system take care of it.
Source(s):
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/browns/2009-04-02-stallworth-co...
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
My girlfriend dislikes me talking to my ex. My ex is also my best friend and we stil...
My grandfather is on facebook and friend requested me. What should I do?
Where would I apply for a marriage license if I don't live in the state I'm getting m...
Would you kill 3 innocent people in order to save 5 (also innocent) people?
My grandfather is on facebook and friend requested me. What should I do?
Where would I apply for a marriage license if I don't live in the state I'm getting m...
Would you kill 3 innocent people in order to save 5 (also innocent) people?
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- kimtin, November 28, 2009 05:55 AM
- jaik1944, November 28, 2009 05:50 AM
- guy3840, November 28, 2009 05:41 AM
- rafirosenblum, November 28, 2009 05:39 AM
- mayrajuarez, November 28, 2009 05:37 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More