answered question

answers (4)

dumblonde
2
Votes
BEST ANSWER  chosen by asker   |  dumblonde  |  February 26, 2009 12:44 AM
I don't know if she will accept but being in porn is not grounds to take away one's children. It does not make you an unfit parent. (I do think she is an unfit parent for other reasons --> She's insane). Many porn stars and sex workers have children and their professions don't make them unfit parents. If they were taking their kids to the office, then that's a whole 'nother issue entirely.

Comment
ssharon
ssharon  |  February 26, 2009 03:54 AM
Why don't they teach issues like this in our law schools instead of things like the rule against perpetuity? Or maybe that's what this really is?
angieh
0
Votes
angieh  |  February 26, 2009 03:18 AM
As bad as it sounds, I think it may actually work in her favor. According to TMZ.com, the company is also offering her and the family health insurance, should she sign with them. In a separate report, Suleman reportedly told Dr. Phil that Kaiser Permanente will not release the eight newborns to her until she has a means to provide from them. Should she sign this adult film deal, she will have income, plus insurance, and that might be enough for her to take them home. Sad, but true.
Comment
ssharon
0
Votes
ssharon  |  February 26, 2009 03:52 AM
The TMZ page has surprising results for their vote given what I assumed to be their typical readers.

That being said, she has the same decision to make as any other woman or man deciding to enter the adult industry. How it impacts her personally, her family and children, etc. are not unique to her. I don't even think her case is that special compared to why many other stars get in the business.

I don't know what time commitment is required for that $1,000,000 but that is a lot of zeros and she is in a tough spot. I only hope she factors in her personal views more than the economic ones before she decides otherwise she may end up with some regrets in a few years.
Comment
albanian
0
Votes
albanian  |  February 26, 2009 04:52 PM
No and no. Have you seen the news pictures of her? No one would pay for "porn" of an ugly middle aged woman. It's just some tabloid being a troll.
If she had a million she might be able to support some of the kids, she's more likely to lose them because she can't. There is certainly no law against porn stars raising their children or otherwise leading normal lives. And she's not an octomom, she's a quattuordecmom (14 kids).
Comment
140

ask any question

Top of Page
Buy Mahalo Dollars
WITH CREDIT CARD OR PAYPAL

Please log in to use this function.