Next Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
M$1.00 Funded By Mahalo ? |
May 05, 2009 02:30 PM
RSS
It sucks to see so much in the way of new, or nearly-new, building materials knocked down like that, but it's a good strategy if you're the bank. When the market picks back up, they can always sell the vacant lots, or pay to build new homes then - when they're more likely to sell and be occupied, thus deterring squatters, vandals, and other nuisances.
The neighbors in that community probably appreciate this, too, because they won't have to deal with those problems, or with looking at a bunch of half-finished homes.
Besides: nothing says that the lots are unusable between now and whenever the market picks back up. There could be all sorts of neat things on that property, like a dog park or some other such thing.
Permalink | Report
davepamn
The first time I heard of something like this was when Ottawa City knocked down some slums downtown and ended up building a beautiful park, back in the 70's during the economic downturn. It reversed a blight in that area and turned that area into an open and lovely area, surrounded by open-air fruit/veggie stands in the summer, and with a no-car camping area in a park-like setting, right down town and only a few blocks from the Houses of Parliament.
It looked a lot like this:
http://www.ottawa.ca/visitors/about/gallery/images/98D_55_1_32.jpg
Since then, I believe the area has been sold for development, or used for more national buildings (it's been years since I was there). But it completely turned that part of town around.
Permalink | Report
Answered Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
When a banks knocks down a vacant home is it a good strategy?
WSJ
A Texas bank decided to demolish 16 new and partially built homes figuring it better to knock them down. The location was Victorville, a location, 85 miles North of Los Angeles. The reason to destroy the homes was the cost exceed the price to sell and the city was fines were increasing because of squatters and vandalism.
If you were a bank what strategy would you use?
Are there alternative strategies that could have worked without requiring the bank to knock down the homes?
A Texas bank decided to demolish 16 new and partially built homes figuring it better to knock them down. The location was Victorville, a location, 85 miles North of Los Angeles. The reason to destroy the homes was the cost exceed the price to sell and the city was fines were increasing because of squatters and vandalism.
If you were a bank what strategy would you use?
Are there alternative strategies that could have worked without requiring the bank to knock down the homes?
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| May 05, 2009 10:11 PM |
The neighbors in that community probably appreciate this, too, because they won't have to deal with those problems, or with looking at a bunch of half-finished homes.
Besides: nothing says that the lots are unusable between now and whenever the market picks back up. There could be all sorts of neat things on that property, like a dog park or some other such thing.
| Asker's Rating: |
Permalink | Report
davepamn
May 08, 2009 05:12 PM
The bank knocking down the buildings says they are experience fines and paper losses daily. Knocking down the building allows the bank to write down the loss and avoid the city fines.
Tip davepamn for this comment
Report
Other Answers (1)
May 05, 2009 02:52 PM
I think it can be a very good strategy. A town doesn't want to have a haven for squatters, and especially if they're new they're going to draw squatters. The first time I heard of something like this was when Ottawa City knocked down some slums downtown and ended up building a beautiful park, back in the 70's during the economic downturn. It reversed a blight in that area and turned that area into an open and lovely area, surrounded by open-air fruit/veggie stands in the summer, and with a no-car camping area in a park-like setting, right down town and only a few blocks from the Houses of Parliament.
It looked a lot like this:
http://www.ottawa.ca/visitors/about/gallery/images/98D_55_1_32.jpg
Since then, I believe the area has been sold for development, or used for more national buildings (it's been years since I was there). But it completely turned that part of town around.
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- staceysmith, November 29, 2009 06:35 AM
- micky, November 29, 2009 06:33 AM
- busybee0609, November 29, 2009 06:14 AM
- richardseymour, November 29, 2009 06:10 AM
- aprielvalerio, November 29, 2009 06:06 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More
