Ask questions via twitter! Message any question to @answers on twitter. We'll publish the question and send you a reply each time there's a new answer.

Warning About Business Law Questions


 

Mahalo Answers is a great place to start your research into Business Law questions, but it's not the final answer.

Mahalo Answers is not a substitute for informed professional advice. If you desire or require professional advice, please consult a qualified provider who is licensed in your state or country. You should always seek independent professional advice before acting on any opinion, advice, or information available on Mahalo Answers.

 
 


Next Question

Question

 
February 03, 2009 06:16 PM

Can a California employer require/force/demand an employee take an unpaid 1 hour lunch break vs. 30min break?

California law requires ONE 10-minute break for every four hours of work, and a 30-minute unpaid meal (lunch) break for every 5 hours of work, unless your shift will end in 6 hours (in which case you don't get another break.)
If you work 9 - 5:30, you'd get one 30-minute meal period and two 10-minute rest periods.
For more, look for the wage and hour standards: www.dol.gov

Question: Can a California employer require/force an employee take an unpaid 1 hour lunch break?

Thus extending the work day an additional 30min for the employee.
Example: 9am - 6pm (instead of leaving at 5:30pm).
Employees generally want a 30min lunch and leave at 5:30pm, NOT a 1 hour lunch and leave at 6pm.
Interesting Question?  Yes (0)   No (0)   
Email to a friend | RSS
 
 

 
   No Best Answer Selected
 
 


Answers (1)

Sort By
 
February 03, 2009 08:05 PM
No. As far as i know from being an employer, California law states you MUST pay employees for their meal break even if the employer extends it.

The law requires that "If an employer fails to provide an employee a meal period in accordance with the applicable provisions of this order, the employer shall pay the employee one (1) hour of pay at the employee’s regular rate of compensation for each workday that the meal period is not provided." California Code of Regulations, Title 8, §11040.
Source(s):
http://www.gotmealbreaks.com/


Helpful Answer?  (1)   (0)    Tip twinturbo for this answer
Permalink | Report
   Reply  
 
 
 
February 06, 2009 01:23 AM
Actually meal breaks are NOT paid for. If you don't allow a meal break, you are in violation, and must pay 1hour (fine). That's what you reference...

The Question again has nothing to do with pay, rather, can an employer require 1 hour meal break? (30min IS required).

Report
 
 
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal

Top Members

This Week All Time
  • cfinke
    cfinke
    2nd Degree Black Belt
    23692 Points
    M$29.75 Earned
  • unwirklich
    unwirklich
    Purple Belt
    2586 Points
    M$143.35 Earned
  • lgalatea
    lgalatea
    Green Belt with a Purple Tip
    1969 Points
    M$52.86 Earned
   See All
 

Most Popular Tags

mahalo(1404)
iphone(449)
music(436)
google(324)
food(290)
beer(267)
online(264)
money(248)
apple(239)
movies(233)
aotd(233)
health(197)
video(190)
free(188)
dog(188)
   See All
 

Categories

Welcome New Members


 
 
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.

Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.

Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More

 
 

Please log in to use this function.