Next Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
M¢25 Funded By Mahalo ? |
October 23, 2009 07:51 PM
RSS
Maybe in her personal circle. I feel that there has always been plenty of empathy and there have always been apathetic people too. As humans, it is normal to pick through and only emphasize the bad for some people and only the good for others. The truth is, we are not getting morally indifferent due to the changes in society. For many, things are getting better. For some, things do seem worse. For most, it's about the same as always. Let me explain:
If you were a young white person in the 50's, your sheltered life may have offered little transgression, but if you looked at your father, you would see high stress and ulcers in many cases. Your mom may have been oppressed. The influence of a varied cultural background would have been deficient or non existence. A young black child had to deal with racism in the 50's and things were dangerous in many situations. There were fewer opportunities back then.
If you were a young woman in the 16th century, you would have few rights and had been seen as property. In other countries, especially out East, there were a lot of starving people throughout history. That's not to say that the standard hobo situation hasn't been lost to time. . . but when my father was young, gypsies were run off. There was no charity toward them.
Yes, times are rough. They are often rough. We have built a small group of individuals who rely on handouts. There are homeless situations that tear at the heart. Crime stinks. But saying that people in general are lacking in empathy is a misconception. Making people feel guilty makes money. Standing on a soap box really gets people listening in. But the truth is, only the people who have empathy will be crestfallen on the assumations that we lack the capacity to feel for one another.
The good news is, most of us are good people. Most of us have a moral compass, and most of us are considerate about our fellow man. There have always been people who think they don't need to care about others, but deep down the writer is wrong. I see nothing but empathy all over our world. If she can't see that, it's a sad thing for her, and my heart breaks for her. Because truly, empathy is what keeps our hearts warm and our country great. Maybe some of it is selfish empathy because it makes a person feel good to care about others, but it may just be what separates us from animals.
Even when faced with starvation, your average human will split his food with another starving soul or even a starving pet. An animal will scarf all the food up and not share a drip, even when it means his buddy will die because of it. . . Don't be disheartened. The world is still good because people aren't going to let it get as bad as some complain it is.
Permalink | Report
Source(s):
Long-time observer of the human condition
Permalink | Report
When I see horrible suffering on the news, especially in far away locales, perhaps a typhoon in Asia, I know there's nothing I can do to relieve the suffering in any way, so I push down my feelings. If I allow myself to really internalize the suffering of the people involved, I'll spend all my time crying and become emotionally incapacitated. I've noticed that there have been times when I'm depressed and more vulnerable and I take these types of news stories to heart much more.
Am I cruel or lacking in empathy? No, I don't think so. In my heart, I care. During moments of meditation, or while praying at church, I routinely ask God to alleviate the suffering I've seen. Unfortunately, that's all I can do for most victims of tragedy.
In cases where I actually have a way to take action to help, I do.
Permalink | Report
Answered Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
Interview w Barbara Ehrenreich, author of Bright-Sided on , she said we have an Empathy Deficit in our Society. Ya think?
Interesting Question?
Yes ()
No ()
- About Barbara Ehrenreich |
- Via Twitter |
- In Books & Authors |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Decided by Votes
| October 23, 2009 08:47 PM | view on twitter |
If you were a young white person in the 50's, your sheltered life may have offered little transgression, but if you looked at your father, you would see high stress and ulcers in many cases. Your mom may have been oppressed. The influence of a varied cultural background would have been deficient or non existence. A young black child had to deal with racism in the 50's and things were dangerous in many situations. There were fewer opportunities back then.
If you were a young woman in the 16th century, you would have few rights and had been seen as property. In other countries, especially out East, there were a lot of starving people throughout history. That's not to say that the standard hobo situation hasn't been lost to time. . . but when my father was young, gypsies were run off. There was no charity toward them.
Yes, times are rough. They are often rough. We have built a small group of individuals who rely on handouts. There are homeless situations that tear at the heart. Crime stinks. But saying that people in general are lacking in empathy is a misconception. Making people feel guilty makes money. Standing on a soap box really gets people listening in. But the truth is, only the people who have empathy will be crestfallen on the assumations that we lack the capacity to feel for one another.
The good news is, most of us are good people. Most of us have a moral compass, and most of us are considerate about our fellow man. There have always been people who think they don't need to care about others, but deep down the writer is wrong. I see nothing but empathy all over our world. If she can't see that, it's a sad thing for her, and my heart breaks for her. Because truly, empathy is what keeps our hearts warm and our country great. Maybe some of it is selfish empathy because it makes a person feel good to care about others, but it may just be what separates us from animals.
Even when faced with starvation, your average human will split his food with another starving soul or even a starving pet. An animal will scarf all the food up and not share a drip, even when it means his buddy will die because of it. . . Don't be disheartened. The world is still good because people aren't going to let it get as bad as some complain it is.
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (2)
October 23, 2009 08:25 PM
| view on twitter
Yes, I think she's right. People are either too involved with their own problems to have much energy for other people's. Or they just have a "me first" attitude. But even if you do feel for other people's troubles, that doesn't mean you're going to do anything about it. There's just too much misery in the world and we have almost no control over it and very little we can do about it. Call it empathy burnout.
Source(s):
Long-time observer of the human condition
Permalink | Report
October 26, 2009 08:01 PM
I don't think it's an Empathy Deficit at work, I think it's an Empathy Filter. In many cases, I feel powerless to bring about any sort of change to a sad situation and I've learned to filter out the true depth of the tragedy. When I see horrible suffering on the news, especially in far away locales, perhaps a typhoon in Asia, I know there's nothing I can do to relieve the suffering in any way, so I push down my feelings. If I allow myself to really internalize the suffering of the people involved, I'll spend all my time crying and become emotionally incapacitated. I've noticed that there have been times when I'm depressed and more vulnerable and I take these types of news stories to heart much more.
Am I cruel or lacking in empathy? No, I don't think so. In my heart, I care. During moments of meditation, or while praying at church, I routinely ask God to alleviate the suffering I've seen. Unfortunately, that's all I can do for most victims of tragedy.
In cases where I actually have a way to take action to help, I do.
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- ehauser, November 28, 2009 07:08 PM
- jwalters7, November 28, 2009 07:03 PM
- lisavela, November 28, 2009 07:01 PM
- kojomensah, November 28, 2009 06:55 PM
- shane34, November 28, 2009 06:50 PM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More