Next Question
RSS
I'm going to cut and paste my answer from a similar answer, as I think it applies here as well.
"I'd say it's brilliant, but I believe he's doing it out of frustration more than any thing else. Link bait? Perhaps it is, as it has certainly drawn some attention, however I doubt that's any part of his motivation.
I can't even begin to fathom the amount of emails and calls the writers at a top blog like TC get on a daily basis; I struggle to deal with the couple of hundred I get myself. I can only surmise the situation has long since become untenable and Arrington sees this move as having the best possibility of a solution.
TC will still get news and even break news, however they may get it more like I suspect they used to in the early days, from trusted contacts and sources rather than PR folks. Just take a moment and imagine all of the PR folks out there, and how they reason that a scattered shotgun approach rather than a focused campaign doesn't really hurt their objective. For a while there it may even have helped; yet lately it's become increasingly difficult for the bloggers to find any real meat in their inbox. As the PR crew senses they are getting less and less or a response they decide to start going for the cell phones, perhaps even texting. Now imagine how insane this could get if you are on the receiving end of things...
So, Michael decided to change the rules. I don't see that he had much of an option really, do you? So, things may get a little odd for a bit, surely some folks will get offended or get their feelings hurt if their embargoes are broken. Before long I'd bet most will learn to put away their shotguns, or at the very least choke them down to a reasonable pattern, something other than wide open. The best among them will cultivate relationships once again, and use a few choice well aimed bullets to get the job done."
Source(s):
http://www.mahalo.com/answers/journalism-and-media/what-do-you-think-of-mic...
Permalink | Report
Interestingly, if it actually does change the way PR crews operate, I think it opens up several new possibilities. One is that PR teams will offer exclusivity to certain trusted blogs, thus shutting the small startup blogs out of the picture, or PR teams will be forced to wait until the embargo time is up. I'm still not sure how the second option would work, as it would then depend on who could write the story fastest.
In all reality, I doubt it will change anything at all. Only time will tell.
Permalink | Report
From reading today's post, was it clear if they will respect MS an Google's embargoes? First they said they will break ALL embargoes, but then they said NO ONE breaks MS and Google embargoes.
Are they big enough to withstand the wrath of the big guys?
Permalink | Report
Answered Question
M$1
December 18, 2008 03:12 AM
Is michael from techcrunch power enough to change the pr game ?
http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/12/17/death-to-the-embargo/
the question should be is michael and techcrunch have the power to change the game ?
http://blog.bloggersmosaic.com/techcrunch-pr-and-embargo-bubble
the question should be is michael and techcrunch have the power to change the game ?
http://blog.bloggersmosaic.com/techcrunch-pr-and-embargo-bubble
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| December 18, 2008 03:28 AM |
"I'd say it's brilliant, but I believe he's doing it out of frustration more than any thing else. Link bait? Perhaps it is, as it has certainly drawn some attention, however I doubt that's any part of his motivation.
I can't even begin to fathom the amount of emails and calls the writers at a top blog like TC get on a daily basis; I struggle to deal with the couple of hundred I get myself. I can only surmise the situation has long since become untenable and Arrington sees this move as having the best possibility of a solution.
TC will still get news and even break news, however they may get it more like I suspect they used to in the early days, from trusted contacts and sources rather than PR folks. Just take a moment and imagine all of the PR folks out there, and how they reason that a scattered shotgun approach rather than a focused campaign doesn't really hurt their objective. For a while there it may even have helped; yet lately it's become increasingly difficult for the bloggers to find any real meat in their inbox. As the PR crew senses they are getting less and less or a response they decide to start going for the cell phones, perhaps even texting. Now imagine how insane this could get if you are on the receiving end of things...
So, Michael decided to change the rules. I don't see that he had much of an option really, do you? So, things may get a little odd for a bit, surely some folks will get offended or get their feelings hurt if their embargoes are broken. Before long I'd bet most will learn to put away their shotguns, or at the very least choke them down to a reasonable pattern, something other than wide open. The best among them will cultivate relationships once again, and use a few choice well aimed bullets to get the job done."
Source(s):
http://www.mahalo.com/answers/journalism-and-media/what-do-you-think-of-mic...
| Asker's Rating: |
• gr8 responed
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (2)
December 18, 2008 04:00 AM
I think he may be on the right track, but that Techcrunch alone won't be enough. I think it will take several more big blogs. If both Techcrunch and Lifehacker did this, then its possible the results might be more promising. Interestingly, if it actually does change the way PR crews operate, I think it opens up several new possibilities. One is that PR teams will offer exclusivity to certain trusted blogs, thus shutting the small startup blogs out of the picture, or PR teams will be forced to wait until the embargo time is up. I'm still not sure how the second option would work, as it would then depend on who could write the story fastest.
In all reality, I doubt it will change anything at all. Only time will tell.
Permalink | Report
December 18, 2008 07:12 AM
Whether he/they can make a change, it's nice to see someone trying. In this instance, it seems like it can't hurt. They are established enough to [hopefully] be able to ride through any ill-will they gather from breaking embargoes. From reading today's post, was it clear if they will respect MS an Google's embargoes? First they said they will break ALL embargoes, but then they said NO ONE breaks MS and Google embargoes.
Are they big enough to withstand the wrath of the big guys?
Permalink | Report
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- kbee_, November 12, 2009 09:26 AM
- reza313, November 12, 2009 09:14 AM
- cambocow, November 12, 2009 09:06 AM
- damondaniels, November 12, 2009 08:45 AM
- ryansouthwell, November 12, 2009 08:43 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More