Next Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
M¢25 Funded By Mahalo ? |
July 13, 2009 04:36 AM
RSS
As you point out, the biggest disadvantage to placing an observatory on the moon is the cost. Other difficulties include protecting the telescope's optics from lunar dust as well as the moon's slow rotation; parts of the sky will be invisible for up to two weeks at a time.
Hubble's successor, the James Webb Space Telescope, is scheduled for launch in 2014. Unlike Hubble, it is optimized for observations at infrared wavelengths, and for this reason it is being placed over a million miles from Earth, opposite the sun at the semi-stable "L2" point, and is equipped with a heat shield to keep infrared energy from Earth and the sun from overwhelming the telescope's sensitive detectors.
Source(s):
http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/
http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/orbit.html
Permalink | Report
Another problem with having a telescope on the moon is the dust that can occur if a small asteroid were to crash into it. If this happened the telescope would have to go into a mode were it could be protected from all of the particles blasted up out of the moon from the impact.
Permalink | Report
stanar
Answered Question

Mahalo is adding a tip to all questions that don't offer a tip.
Can we use moon as a base for our next gen space telescope?
As Hubble ST is nearing it's life span, why cant we use our moon for the next gen space telescope? One issue is the distance, maintenance will be expensive. But in the future, we plan to have a permanent base anyway.
Interesting Question?
Yes (0)
No (0)
- In Astronomy & Space |
- Tags: telescope, space |
- |
- Report |
-
Share
RSS
Best Answer Chosen by Asker
| July 13, 2009 09:14 AM |
Hubble's successor, the James Webb Space Telescope, is scheduled for launch in 2014. Unlike Hubble, it is optimized for observations at infrared wavelengths, and for this reason it is being placed over a million miles from Earth, opposite the sun at the semi-stable "L2" point, and is equipped with a heat shield to keep infrared energy from Earth and the sun from overwhelming the telescope's sensitive detectors.
Source(s):
http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/
http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/orbit.html
| Asker's Rating: |
Permalink | Report
Other Answers (1)
July 14, 2009 12:55 AM
It would be difficult since the moon does not have any atmosphere. We would need a telescope that would look out in another light form, ie uv, gamma, xray to detect objects. Another problem with having a telescope on the moon is the dust that can occur if a small asteroid were to crash into it. If this happened the telescope would have to go into a mode were it could be protected from all of the particles blasted up out of the moon from the impact.
Permalink | Report
stanar
July 14, 2009 02:36 AM
Why do you say it would be difficult to use "regular form" of light without an atmosphere?
Tip stanar for this comment
Report
July 14, 2009 02:41 AM
Like here on Earth, our atmosphere is what makes us see the 'twinkle' of the stars. Since there is no atmosphere on the moon (hence the space suites, oxygen tanks, etc) stars are not visible from the rock. This is one of the reasons why many people thought the moon landing was a hoax because there was no stars shown when the astronauts were on the moon.
Report
July 15, 2009 01:53 AM
@daniel8802 you seem to be completely misinformed. Actually you will be able to see even distant faint stars in visible light which cant be seen from the earth. You need to do some studying. Stars are seen in the astronaut pictures because of the focusing issues, not as you think. Please do some research and be clarified yourself. here is a discover blog I found for you.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/20/can-i-see-more-stars-from-space/
If I find additional info, I will send it your way.
Report
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/07/20/can-i-see-more-stars-from-space/
If I find additional info, I will send it your way.
Answer this Question
Related Questions
Ask a Question
Buy Mahalo Dollars with Credit Card or PayPal
Top Members
Most Popular Tags
Categories
- Anonymous
- Arts & Design
- Beauty & Style
- Books & Authors
- Business
- Cars & Transportation
- Consumer Electronics
- Coupons Deals
- Education
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Fitness
- Food & Drink
- From Email
- From Iphone
- From Twitter
- Health
- History
- Hobbies
- Home & Garden
- How Tos
- Humor
- Jobs
- Legal
- Local
- Love & Relationships
- Mahalo Answers Community
- Money
- Music
- News
- NSFW
- Parenting
- Pets
- Science & Mathematics
- Services
- Shopping
- Social Science
- Society & Culture
- Sports
- Technology & Internet
- Travel
- Video Games
Welcome New Members
- michellejleetha..., November 28, 2009 02:52 AM
- reactive, November 28, 2009 02:39 AM
- danandrysiak, November 28, 2009 02:30 AM
- goldmind123, November 28, 2009 02:26 AM
- websee20, November 28, 2009 02:19 AM
Mahalo Dollars are the currency of Mahalo Answers.
Each Mahalo Dollar costs $1.
Once you earn more than 40 Mahalo Dollars, you can request to be paid via PayPal. Each Mahalo Dollar is currently worth $0.75 when paid out via PayPal. Learn More